TOV
21. அப்படியானால் நியாயப்பிரமாணம் தேவனுடைய வாக்குத்தத்தங்களுக்கு விரோதமா? அல்லவே; உயிரைக் கொடுக்கத்தக்க நியாயப்பிரமாணம் அருளப்பட்டிருந்ததானால், நீதியானது நியாயப்பிரமாணத்தினால் உண்டாயிருக்குமே.

ERVTA
21. இதனால் சட்டம் தேவனுடைய வாக்குறுதிக்கு எதிரானவை என்று பொருள் கொள்ள முடியுமா? முடியாது. மனிதர்களுக்கு ஜீவனைக் கொடுக்கக்கூடிய ஒரு சட்டம் இருந்தால் பிறகு நாம் அதனைக் கடைப்பிடித்து வாழ்வதன் மூலமே தேவனுக்கு வேண்டியவராக முடியும்.

IRVTA
21. அப்படியென்றால் நியாயப்பிரமாணம் தேவனுடைய வாக்குத்தத்தங்களுக்கு எதிரானதா? இல்லையே; நியாயப்பிரமாணம் உயிரைக் கொடுக்கக்கூடியதாக இருந்திருந்தால், நீதியானது நியாயப்பிரமாணத்தினால் உண்டாயிருக்குமே.

ECTA
21. அப்படியானால், திருச்சட்டம் கடவுளின் வாக்குறுதிகளுக்கு முரணானதா? ஒருபோதும் இல்லை. வாழ்வு அளிக்க வல்லதொரு சட்டம் தரப்பட்டிருந்தால் அந்தச் சட்டத்தின் வழியாகவே மனிதர் இறைவனுக்கு ஏற்புடையவர் ஆகியிருக்கலாம்.

RCTA
21. அப்படியானால் திருச்சட்டம் கடவுளின் வாக்குறுதிகளுக்கு முரணானதா? ஒருகாலும் இல்லை. வாழ்வு அளிக்க வல்லதொரு சட்டம் தரப்பட்டிருந்தால், சட்டத்தின் வழியாய் மெய்யாகவே மனிதன் இறைவனுக்கு ஏற்புடையவனாகி இருக்கலாம்.

OCVTA
21. அப்படியானால் மோசேயின் சட்டம் இறைவனுடைய வாக்குத்தத்தங்களுக்கு விரோதமானதா? ஒருபோதும் இல்லை. மோசேயின் சட்டம் வாழ்வை அளிக்கும்படி கொடுக்கப்பட்டிருந்தால், நிச்சயமாக மோசேயின் சட்டத்தின் மூலமாகவே நீதி வந்திருக்கும்.



KJV
21. [Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.

AMP
21. Is the Law then contrary and opposed to the promises of God? Of course not! For if a Law had been given which could confer [spiritual] life, then righteousness and right standing with God would certainly have come by Law.

KJVP
21. [ Is ] the G3588 T-NSM law G3551 N-NSM then G3767 CONJ against G2596 PREP the G3588 T-GPF promises G1860 N-GPF of God G2316 N-GSM ? God forbid G1096 V-2ADO-3S : for G1063 CONJ if G1487 COND there had been a law G3551 N-NSM given G1325 V-API-3S which could G1410 V-PNP-NSM have given life G2227 V-AAN , verily G3689 ADV righteousness G1343 N-NSF should have been G2258 V-IXI-3S by G1537 PREP the law G3551 N-GSM .

YLT
21. the law, then, [is] against the promises of God? -- let it not be! for if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly by law there would have been the righteousness,

ASV
21. Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.

WEB
21. Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most assuredly righteousness would have been of the law.

NASB
21. Is the law then opposed to the promises (of God)? Of course not! For if a law had been given that could bring life, then righteousness would in reality come from the law.

ESV
21. Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law.

RV
21. Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.

RSV
21. Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not; for if a law had been given which could make alive, then righteousness would indeed be by the law.

NKJV
21. [Is] the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.

MKJV
21. Is the Law then against the promises of God? Let it not be said! For if a law had been given which could have given life, indeed righteousness would have been out of Law.

AKJV
21. Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness should have been by the law.

NRSV
21. Is the law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could make alive, then righteousness would indeed come through the law.

NIV
21. Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.

NIRV
21. So is the law opposed to God's promises? Certainly not! What if a law had been given that could give life? Then people could become right with God by obeying the law.

NLT
21. Is there a conflict, then, between God's law and God's promises? Absolutely not! If the law could give us new life, we could be made right with God by obeying it.

MSG
21. If such is the case, is the law, then, an anti-promise, a negation of God's will for us? Not at all. Its purpose was to make obvious to everyone that we are, in ourselves, out of right relationship with God, and therefore to show us the futility of devising some religious system for getting by our own efforts what we can only get by waiting in faith for God to complete his promise. For if any kind of rule-keeping had power to create life in us, we would certainly have gotten it by this time.

GNB
21. Does this mean that the Law is against God's promises? No, not at all! For if human beings had received a law that could bring life, then everyone could be put right with God by obeying it.

NET
21. Is the law therefore opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.

ERVEN
21. Does this mean that the law works against God's promises? Of course not. The law was never God's way of giving new life to people. If it were, then we could be made right with God by following the law.